Current:Home > StocksRead the full text of the dissents in the Supreme Court's affirmative action ruling by Sotomayor and Jackson -CapitalEdge
Read the full text of the dissents in the Supreme Court's affirmative action ruling by Sotomayor and Jackson
View
Date:2025-04-14 08:12:26
Washington — The Supreme Court's landmark decision rejecting affirmative action in higher education prompted sharp dissents from two members of the court's liberal wing, Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.
In the highly anticipated ruling, the court's conservative majority invalidated the race-conscious admissions programs at Harvard College, the nation's oldest private school, and the University of North Carolina, the oldest public school, finding they were unconstitutional.
The court's rejection of affirmative action in college admissions is likely to reshape how higher education institutions across the country consider applicants, as colleges and universities can no longer use race as a factor in their admissions' decisions.
Chief Justice John Roberts, who authored the majority opinion, said universities can, however, consider a students' discussion of how race affected his or her life, such as in application essays.
The Supreme Court split along ideological lines in the two cases involving Harvard and the University of North Carolina, though Jackson took no part in the consideration of the dispute involving Harvard.
She and Sotomayor, who read her opinion allowed from the bench, did not mince words in criticizing the decision from the Supreme Court's six-justice conservative majority.
"With let-them-eat-cake obliviousness, today, the majority pulls the ripcord and announces 'colorblindness for all' by legal fiat," Jackson wrote. "But deeming race irrelevant in law does not make it so in life."
Sotomayor, meanwhile, warned the decision will have a "devastating impact" on the nation, as the majority's "vision of race neutrality will entrench racial segregation in higher education because racial inequality will persist so long as it is ignored."
Read the full dissents from Sotomayor and Jackson, whose dissent begins on page 70 below:
- In:
- Affirmative Action
- Supreme Court of the United States
veryGood! (8767)
Related
- EU countries double down on a halt to Syrian asylum claims but will not yet send people back
- King Charles III's Official Coronation Portrait Revealed
- ‘Extreme’ Changes Underway in Some of Antarctica’s Biggest Glaciers
- False information is everywhere. 'Pre-bunking' tries to head it off early
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
- IRS sends bills to taxpayers with the wrong due date for some
- Health department medical detectives find 84% of U.S. maternal deaths are preventable
- Children's hospitals grapple with a nationwide surge in RSV infections
- Federal hiring is about to get the Trump treatment
- Why did he suspect a COVID surge was coming? He followed the digital breadcrumbs
Ranking
- California DMV apologizes for license plate that some say mocks Oct. 7 attack on Israel
- Today’s Climate: July 26, 2010
- Shanghai Disney Resort will close indefinitely starting on Halloween due to COVID-19
- Amazon Fires Spark Growing International Criticism of Brazil
- DoorDash steps up driver ID checks after traffic safety complaints
- Derek Jeter Privately Welcomes Baby No. 4 With Wife Hannah Jeter
- Sum 41 Announces Band's Breakup After 27 Years Together
- What to know now that hearing aids are available over the counter
Recommendation
All That You Wanted to Know About She’s All That
Beyond Condoms!
Today’s Climate: July 24-25, 2010
Brain Cells In A Dish Play Pong And Other Brain Adventures
Trump suggestion that Egypt, Jordan absorb Palestinians from Gaza draws rejections, confusion
Omicron keeps finding new evolutionary tricks to outsmart our immunity
Visitors at Grand Teton National Park accused of harassing baby bison
The story of two bird-saving brothers in India gets an Oscar nom, an HBO premiere